WHU(Exeter)
1:16 Thu Jan 12
Re: Prince Harry
|
H&P, so in answer to my saying that you stereotype people, you reply that I post "like a typical Sun and Mail consumer"...
|
Sir Alf
12:20 Thu Jan 12
Re: Prince Harry
|
Life is made much harder when you are dishonest and usually ( sociopaths etc.. aside ) will cause psychological issues and undermine self esteem, cause shame ( conscious or unconscious ) at some point.
The psychological mess he is in is quite alarming although how much of this nonsense has any truth is questionable especially since there are millions to be earned and Megan's ambitions for fame, social climbing, political influence seem to be insatiable ( that's another whole psychological discussion ).
Harry will have his millions ( or should I say Megs will have the millions she "wants" ) but he will find out that will not make him happy and content. Relationships are what makes life worth living and are the basis of good mental health. In other words, your relationships with family and friends are the key to happiness and contentment and make life worth living.
Hopefully his immediate family will satisfy that need but who knows how healthy those relationships will be really?
Substance abuse risks very high for Harold / Henry? I wager they are.
|
New Jersey
11:41 Thu Jan 12
Re: Prince Harry
|
Although totally bullshit, I quite like the conspiracy theory that the UK establishment had Diana killed as she was pregnant with Dodi Fayed's kid and they couldn't have the future King's ex wife bringing up a Muslim!! If Netflix's next season of The Crown alluded to that it would cause a bit of a stir!
|
Side of Ham
11:30 Thu Jan 12
Re: Prince Harry
|
….well his heir to the throne….the other is dubious apparently…..
|
Side of Ham
11:28 Thu Jan 12
Re: Prince Harry
|
Crass, I have it that she was Charlie’s second choice as his first choice wasn’t ‘pure’ enough but it was ok once he’d had his kids with the ‘pure’ one……
|
Crassus
11:24 Thu Jan 12
Re: Prince Harry
|
Side
I'm not so sure she was 'second choice', more a kind of royal Sullivan x Downes gift that was never wanted but had to be taken
|
cholo
11:15 Thu Jan 12
Re: Prince Harry
|
Charlie and Camilla goes back way earlier than Will Carling.
Both cunts though if you ask me.
|
Side of Ham
11:14 Thu Jan 12
Re: Prince Harry
|
Lee, there’s that little factor his mum was always second choice, it doesn’t always come down to ‘who shagged first’…..
|
twoleftfeet
11:08 Thu Jan 12
Re: Prince Harry
|
All this poor Princess Diana thing is bullshit, she was shagging around way before Charlie.
Will Carling can testify to that.
|
Crassus
10:54 Thu Jan 12
Re: Prince Harry
|
BRANDED
Numerously and without a great deal of concern as to who was on the other end of it too
|
BRANDED
10:52 Thu Jan 12
Re: Prince Harry
|
Do you think she was just looking for cock?
|
Crassus
10:52 Thu Jan 12
Re: Prince Harry
|
The royal entourage retain blood phials relevant to the family, marked by blood group
They are kept together, except one, Ginge, reason being it is incompatible with the King's
Source?
An ex schoolmate who joined plod and gravitated to Royal Protection
Make of it what you will, but the bloke had no reason to lie to his wife about it, who blabbed when pissed to mine. Apparently commonly acknowledged within the Royal Family and could be the part cause of Harrold's ire - a right 'Spare' if you
Interesting that it has been alluded to again recently
|
Lee Trundle
10:46 Thu Jan 12
Re: Prince Harry
|
Side of Ham 10:40 Thu Jan 12
"Well it looks like Trunds….Harry looked at what caused his mums actions….."
I hope for his sake, that someone puts him straight then. There's a possibly she was playing away first. And then her affair with Hewitt started pretty much the same time as Charles was back knobbing Camilla (sorry all you Diana fans out there).
|
BRANDED
10:41 Thu Jan 12
Re: Prince Harry
|
I would say he supports his mum. Thing is the bloke’s been in the press for free all his life without having his say. Now he’s had his say which, if you’ve read it, gives an added dimension to the view of the Crown and its workings.
I didnt buy it and am unlikely to read it.
|
Side of Ham
10:40 Thu Jan 12
Re: Prince Harry
|
Well it looks like Trunds….Harry looked at what caused his mums actions…..
|
Lee Trundle
10:33 Thu Jan 12
Re: Prince Harry
|
"otherwise Harry can counter that lame mindset with his dad betraying his mums trust & marriage and not giving a shit about his children’s feelings when carrying on a past relationship"
I wonder what he thinks about his mothers actions, or perhaps he's been fooled by the likes of the Daily Express also?
|
Kaiser Zoso
10:27 Thu Jan 12
Re: Prince Harry
|
30 pieces of silver
Obviously the money is worth it for him
not everyone is built that way though.
|
BRANDED
10:23 Thu Jan 12
Re: Prince Harry
|
Sold
Sales of English version of Prince Harry's Spare hit 'extraordinary' 1.4 million on first day
I guess they cant be arsed with reviews in NZ or New York son
|
Side of Ham
9:42 Thu Jan 12
Re: Prince Harry
|
Northern Sold 9:33 Wed Jan 11
You need to man up a bit Sold…..otherwise Harry can counter that lame mindset with his dad betraying his mums trust & marriage and not giving a shit about his children’s feelings when carrying on a past relationship……but that would mean betraying someone who had already betrayed him and his mum.
It’s all a cunt and they are all cunts except you support the hierarchy…..like they are sweetness and light…..the only one that was is now gone.
|
Mike Oxsaw
1:46 Thu Jan 12
Re: Prince Harry
|
Given that MSM derives much of it's content directly from social media these days, it's influencers and toxic corner defenders on all/any social media that Harry should be going after, not the MSM middle men.
|
Hammer and Pickle
10:24 Wed Jan 11
Re: Prince Harry
|
Glad we're in agreement then.
Who said the toxic relationship between the tabloids and the Royals was a revelation? I'm talking about the British public growing a pair and not consuming the toxin.
|
| 
